On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 03:19:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:48:14 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The bits I recommend taking are these: > > * debian/rules: pass getconf LFS_CFLAGS so that we get a 64-bit rlimit > > interface. Closes: #579402. > > * Update debian/source.lintian-overrides to clean up some spurious > > warnings. > > * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1. > > * Add lintian overrides for a few more spurious warnings. > > * debian/patches-applied/no_PATH_MAX_on_hurd: define PATH_MAX for > > compatibility when it's not already set. Closes: #552043. > > * debian/local/pam-auth-update: Don't try to pass embedded newlines to > > debconf; backslash-escape them instead and use CAPB escape. > > * debian/local/pam-auth-update: sort additional module options before > > writing them out, so that we don't wind up with a different config file > > on every invocation. Thanks to Jim Paris <jim@jtan.com> for the patch. > > Closes: #594123. > > The pam-auth-update fix for embedded newlines is a potential security issue > > with certain locally generated PAM module profiles (no bug filed). > > What would you like me to do? > The above list sounds good to me. Ok, thanks - uploading and will file the needful bug once done. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature