On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:01:49PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 16:34:01 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > > I was not aware that there was a new goffice package uploaded to unstable > > without an unblock request. Ray, was the upload intended for the Squeeze > > release (and you just forgot to ask Debian Release for a freeze exception) > > or is it intended for Debian sid only? > > It is intended for sid only. Gnumeric and goffice releases often coincide > and new gnumeric releases at times require new goffice releases, so I tend > to handle them in tandem. Seems you missed this bit of the recent release d-d-a post: | Please also note that since many updates (hopefully, the vast majority) | will still be going in through unstable, major changes in unstable right | now can disrupt efforts to get RC bugs fixed. We don't ask you not to | make changes in unstable, but we do ask that you be aware of the effects | your changes can have -- especially if you maintain a library. Please | continue to keep disruptive changes out of unstable, and continue making | use of experimental where appropriate. Note that you can stage NEW uploads | in experimental to avoid disruption in unstable. Regards, Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature