[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#593544: gnucash: Upgrade from Debian Lenny looses Online Banking (AqBanking) settings



Hi Julien, hi Ray,

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:45:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:59:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 19:25:45 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Release Team,
> > > 
> > > Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:06:31 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> > > >> Please see the attached debdiff of the changes that I would like to make
> > > >> to the package in Squeeze (via unstable). Please approve for upload.
> > > >>
> > > > Please upload, and get back to us when the package has been accepted.
> > > 
> > > Gnucash 2.2.9-7 has just been accepted.
> > > 
> > And unblocked.
> > 
> It picked up a dependency on new goffice:
> gnucash (2.2.9-6 to 2.2.9-7)
>     Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG 
>     Too young, only 8 of 10 days old
>     Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by jcristau
>     Not considered
>     Depends: gnucash goffice (not considered)
> 
> goffice (0.8.8-1 to 0.8.9-1)
>     Maintainer: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) 
>     10 days old (needed 10 days)
>     Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed)
>     Not considered
> 
> Is the new goffice supposed to get in squeeze, or do we have to go
> through t-p-u for gnucash?

I was not aware that there was a new goffice package uploaded to unstable
without an unblock request. Ray, was the upload intended for the Squeeze
release (and you just forgot to ask Debian Release for a freeze exception) or
is it intended for Debian sid only?

Regards,
Micha


Reply to: