[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

freeze exception request for uruk 20100831-2 (was: Re: freeze exception [...])



Hi,

Could you please allow uruk 20100831-2 in squeeze?

Op Tue 31 Aug 2010 om 01:25:12 +0200 schreef Joost van Baal:
> 
> Mehdi Dogguy: thanks for your prompt reply.
> 
> Op Fri 27 Aug 2010 om 03:15:46 +0200 schreef Mehdi Dogguy:
> > On 08/27/2010 01:55 PM, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > > 
> > > Could you please allow uruk 20100823-1 in squeeze?  It fixes problems
> > > with dependency based boot sequencing and has improved support for
> > > IPv6.  It was accepted in unstable at Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:17:07
> > > +0000.  It is "arch all", so no waiting for autobuilders is 
> > > involved.
<snip>

> > In the diff, I read:
> > 
> > -net_eth0=0.0.0.0/0
> > -net_eth1=192.168.0.0/16
> > +net_eth0=0/0          # FIXME only allow full names here?
> > +net_eth1=192.168./16
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > -sources_eth0_tcp_mail="10.0.0.0/24 10.56.38.0/24 192.168.6.26"
> > +sources_eth0_tcp_mail="10./24 10.56.38./24 192.168.6.26"
> > +                                              # FIXME: does iptables
> > +                                              # know how to parse this?
> > 
> > Admittedly, this portion appears in the rc file under the doc/ directory.
> > In case you are still wondering if that works, the answer is: no, it
> > doesn't! Please fix your documentation.
> 
> Thanks, done (in 20100831-1).

In 20100831-2 the last part of the fix for #581659 was added (an issue related
to dependency based boot sequencing).

Release 20100831-2 was accepted in unstable at Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:47:06 +0000
Testing now ships 20080330-1.

Full diff between the version in testing and this candidate is available from
http://mdcc.cx/tmp/uruk/uruk-20080330-1_20100831-2.diff .

Here the relevant snippets from debian/changelog:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

uruk (20100831-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * postinst: add "1" to the runlevels to stop the service in update-rc.d
    call: back in sync with LSB headers in upstream supplied init-script
    (Closes: #581659).

> uruk (20100823-1) unstable; urgency=low
> 
>   * New upstream release.  Missed 20100820 (and 20100821), which introduced:
>     + Fix bugs in support for dependency based boot sequencing (which is the
>       default in "Squeeze"; Boot Performance is a goal for the upcoming Debian
>       "Squeeze" release)
>       - init/uruk.in: Fix LSB init header: we want to start early in boot
>         sequence (on entering runlevel S).  LSB init.d header however had
>         "Default-Start: 2 3 5". This is now fixed to S.  Partially fixes
>         bug 581659. (Upgrade's are likely not yet handled gracefully.) Thanks
>         Petter Reinholdtsen for reporting and for the patch.
>       - Furthermore, change Default-Stop: "0 6" to "0 1 6": no need to special
>         case runlevel 1 (thanks lintian).
>       - Finally, added "$remote_fs" to Required-Start: and Required-Stop: since
>         obviously we need /usr/sbin/uruk to be available (thanks again lintian).
>     + Enable support for IPv6 packet filtering (full IPv6 support
>       is a goal for the upcoming Debian "Squeeze" release).  ip6tables is now
>       enabled in the uruk script by default.  If you interact with uruk using
>       the init script (which is the default), uruk's default behaviour however
>       is not changed.
> [...]
--------------------------------------------------------------------


Bye,

Joost

-- 
The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple.  After that, it's all learned.
        -- Bruce Ediger, on X interfaces

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: