Re: freeze exception request for uruk 20100823-1

[Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>]

On 08/27/2010 01:55 PM, Joost van Baal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could you please allow uruk 20100823-1 in squeeze?  It fixes problems
> with dependency based boot sequencing and has improved support for
> IPv6.  It was accepted in unstable at Thu, 26 Aug 2010 06:17:07
> +0000.  It is "arch all", so no waiting for autobuilders is 
> involved.
> 

Well, you don't need to introduce a new upstream release to fix the init
script's headers.

In the diff, I read:

-net_eth0=0.0.0.0/0
-net_eth1=192.168.0.0/16
+net_eth0=0/0          # FIXME only allow full names here?
+net_eth1=192.168./16

and

-sources_eth0_tcp_mail="10.0.0.0/24 10.56.38.0/24 192.168.6.26"
+sources_eth0_tcp_mail="10./24 10.56.38./24 192.168.6.26"
+                                              # FIXME: does iptables
+                                              # know how to parse this?

Admittedly, this portion appears in the rc file under the doc/ directory.
In case you are still wondering if that works, the answer is: no, it
doesn't! Please fix your documentation.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/