On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:45:43 +0200 Evgeni Golov <evgeni@debian.org> wrote: > [ please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed to -release@ ] > geany-plugins 0.19 ships 6 new plugins, one of which needs a yet > unpackaged (in Debian) library. For Squeeze, I'd recommend simply not packaging the one plugin which has a dependency which is not currently in Debian. > >From the users point of view, it would be best to upload ctpl (the > missing library) and geany-plugins with all the new plugins enabled. As a geany user, I think the ctpl plugin is actually in quite a narrow niche and will not be missed by many users. However, losing all plugins for geany because of one lesser-used one is clearly not in the interest of any users. > We could also disable the plugin that needs ctpl and only ship 5 new > ones. That's my preference but note, I'm only lurking here as a geany user and unofficial RT volunteer whilst I sort out a point release for Emdebian Lenny and prepare for an Emdebian release alongside Squeeze. > Thus my question: which of the three options would be ok from the RT > point of view and please our users most? Please wait for comments from others before proceeding. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
Attachment:
pgpDh0PnciS0B.pgp
Description: PGP signature