[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Pending removal of deborphan



On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Michael Gilbert
<michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:45:08 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
>> without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
>> of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
>> over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it
>> from testing.
>
> I'll adopt it if thats what's needed, but I would prefer to co-maintain
> it.  I personally don't see bug #592068 as severe, and I don't see any
> other critical issues with the package right now, so I don't really
> understand the maintainer's dire tone.  I think the package is fine
> as-is for squeeze.
>
> Mike
Well, I would like to maintain it too, but I'm not sure to have the
needed knowledge. I think Mike's opinions are right and I really don't
understand maintainer's decision.

Devid
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20100811150327.a659bf25.michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20100811150327.a659bf25.michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com
>
>


Reply to: