Re: Pending removal of deborphan
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:45:08 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
> without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
> of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it
> over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it
> from testing.
I'll adopt it if thats what's needed, but I would prefer to co-maintain
it. I personally don't see bug #592068 as severe, and I don't see any
other critical issues with the package right now, so I don't really
understand the maintainer's dire tone. I think the package is fine
as-is for squeeze.
Mike
Reply to: