Re: Transition status

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Tue, May 4, 2010 08:34, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> "Steve M. Robbins" <steve@sumost.ca> writes:
>> Regarding the boost-defaults transition to 1.42: is there a status
>> summary of the binNMU campaign?  Is there a list of the packages that
>> still depend on Boost 1.40 -- or, better an simple command that
>> I can dig up this info myself?
>
> dak rm -Rn -s unstable boost1.40 (on merkel or ries) will tell you which
> packages would get broken if boost1.40 would be removed from unstable.

Also note that there are a number of packages which explicitly
build-depend on boost1.40 packages (as shown by the command Marc
mentioned) which are therefore not able to be binNMUed to support 1.42:

# Broken Build-Depends:
anytun: libboost-regex1.40-dev
        libboost-serialization1.40-dev
        libboost-system1.40-dev
        libboost-thread1.40-dev
dans-gdal-scripts: libboost1.40-dev
gpsshogi: libboost1.40-all-dev
libosl: libboost1.40-all-dev
tintii: libboost-graph1.40-dev

Regards,

Adam