Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

To: debian release team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
Cc: 536481@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:34:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100331093409.GZ19557@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian release team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>, 536481@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100331085856.GA1605@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net>
References: <[🔎] 20100331085856.GA1605@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net>

Hi,

* martin f krafft (madduck@debian.org) [100331 11:09]:
> Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481?

why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a
dependency? The bugreport unfortunatly doesn't say anything.


Andi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>

References:
- Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
  - From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
Next by Date: Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
Previous by thread: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
Next by thread: Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread