On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 00:29:45 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 09:44:57PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Sune Vuorela (nospam@vuorela.dk) [100214 21:32]: > > I fear I need to agree with you. We should have libjpeg62 with > > symbols, recompile every package build-depending on libjpeg*-dev after > > that till the release, and then move to libjpeg8 (or whatever it is) > > at the begining of the squeeze+1-cycle (and we can be sure nothing > > breaks because of the symbols). > > Ok so I have experimented with a libjpeg62 source with versionned symbols, > It works fine but for an annoying problem: > Bill, see <slrnhni28d.nfa.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com>. It doesn't look like there's any way we can switch gtk and qt to libjpeg8 while (non symbol versioned) libjpeg62 is mandated by LSB (unless we decide to ignore the LSB). Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature