Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:41:00AM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> [...]
> >>>>On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >>>>>nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2
> >>>>>gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild
> >>>>>with fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746' dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1
> >>>>>galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1
> >>>>>xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= 1.9.1.6-2)'
> [...]
> >It seems the nmus haven't triggered on the architectures where
> >xulrunner-dev >= 1.9.1.6-2 is available. Could you check what is
> >happening ?
>
> Which package / architecture combinations haven't been tried that
> you think should have been?
>
> The archive is still at xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1 for alpha, armel, mips,
> powerpc and sparc. So far as I can see, all other architectures have
> built all of the binNMUs, with a couple of exceptions for e.g.
> gluezilla being not-for-us on mipsel.
Mmmmm I was basing my mail on
https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=galeon and likewise for others
packages, which only show the logs for the non binNMUs version for the
ones that are currently not dep-wait.
Turns out the buildd site is wrong, since
http://packages.debian.org/sid/galeon lists the binNMU versions.
Sorry for the noise.
Mike
Reply to: