Re: Please BinNMU 5 packages to fix their dependencies
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 07:39:45PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:04 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 06:57:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:39:17AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > nmu gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild with fixed dh_xulrunner, see #567746'
> > > > dw gluezilla_2.4.3-1 galeon_2.0.7-1.2 chmsee_1.0.7-1.2 gnome-python-extras_2.25.3-4.1 xiphos_3.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'xulrunner (>= 1.9.1.6-2)'
> > >
> > > I'm wondering... is the >= syntax properly handled ? 1.9.1.6-2 has been
> > > available on (some) architectures for a few days, but none of the
> > > packages above have apparently been attempted to be built.
> >
> > Cyril Brulebois enlighted me with the obvious: the dep-wait should be on
> > xulrunner-dev (>= 1.9.1.6-2), not xulrunner.
>
> dep-waits fixed.
It seems the nmus haven't triggered on the architectures where
xulrunner-dev >= 1.9.1.6-2 is available. Could you check what is
happening ?
Mike
Reply to: