[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: JPEG 8 transition



* Sune Vuorela (nospam@vuorela.dk) [100214 23:32]:
> On 2010-02-14, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de> wrote:
> > --=-=-=
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:
> >> * Sune Vuorela (nospam@vuorela.dk) [100214 21:32]:
> >>> I currently think roll-back, doing things properly, going ahead, is the
> >>> way forward.
> >> I fear I need to agree with you. We should have libjpeg62 with
> >> symbols, recompile every package build-depending on libjpeg*-dev after
> >> that till the release, and then move to libjpeg8 (or whatever it is)
> >> at the begining of the squeeze+1-cycle (and we can be sure nothing
> >> breaks because of the symbols).
> >
> > I think we might even do this before releazing squeeze. Once we have
> > versioned symbols, the transition won't hurt as much.
> 
> Except breaking partial upgrades

We could conflict with the versions in lenny though. But that can be
discussed after the current breakage has been fixed.


Cheers,
Andi


Reply to: