[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#562762: marked as done (nmu: opensaml2_2.3-1)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:24:51 +0100
with message-id <4B3A3B63.8040409@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#562762: nmu: opensaml2_2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #562762,
regarding nmu: opensaml2_2.3-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
562762: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562762
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

xml-security-c and xmltooling have now been rebuilt against Xerces-C
3.1, so it's time for OpenSAML.  I was incorrect in my earlier belief
that upstream released a new version, so just doing a binNMU is the
best approach.  Could you schedule them?

Thanks!

After OpenSAML, just the Shibboleth SP packages are left, and for those
I do have a new upstream version to upload (as soon as OpenSAML 2 has
been built most places).

nmu opensaml2_2.3-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against Xerces-C 3.1."

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686-bigmem (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Russ Allbery wrote:
> xml-security-c and xmltooling have now been rebuilt against Xerces-C
> 3.1, so it's time for OpenSAML.  I was incorrect in my earlier belief
> that upstream released a new version, so just doing a binNMU is the
> best approach.  Could you schedule them?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> After OpenSAML, just the Shibboleth SP packages are left, and for those
> I do have a new upstream version to upload (as soon as OpenSAML 2 has
> been built most places).
> 
> nmu opensaml2_2.3-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against Xerces-C 3.1."

binNMUs scheduled.

Cheers

Luk

--- End Message ---
Reply to: