[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: any idea why xz-utils 4.999.9beta+20091016-1 and shogun 0.9.1-1 are not yet in unstable?



Soeren Sonnenburg <sonne@debian.org> (10/12/2009):
> Page http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=xz-utils lists
> xz-utils to be out of date on all archs even though it built
> everywhere according to
> https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=xz-utils

liblzma0 got replaced with liblzma1. Details can be found on:
  http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals

> Same for shogun

Same for shugun indeed: libshogun vs. libshogun6.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: