On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:51 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Soeren Sonnenburg <sonne@debian.org> (10/12/2009): Dear Cyril, I am afraid I don't fully understand. > > Page http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=xz-utils lists > > xz-utils to be out of date on all archs even though it built > > everywhere according to > > https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=xz-utils > > liblzma0 got replaced with liblzma1. Details can be found on: > http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals But xz-utils (the source package) creates libzma1. > > Same for shogun > > Same for shugun indeed: libshogun vs. libshogun6. Same here shogun (the source package) creates libshogun6. I understand both obsolete another package (libzma0/libshogun5) but they could peacefully coexist with the old package. So I don't understand why they don't migrate to testing and are even listed not yet build on all archs ... Or should I ask for RM: libshogun5 -- RoM ? Soeren -- For the one fact about the future of which we can be certain is that it will be utterly fantastic. -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1962
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part