Le dimanche 16 août 2009 à 15:57 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > > * How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those > > happen? Can we do something to make them easier? > > As for transitions per se, here are the ones already planned: > * evolution: the move from bonobo to D-Bus (planned for 3.0) will > certainly not go unnoticed for reverse dependencies, it’s > possible that even the API changes. > * at-spi: being completely revamped for 3.0. It has only 2 rdeps > which don’t belong into GNOME, however. > * libgda: new version waiting in NEW, API is incompatible. > * gnome-desktop, libgnomekbd, gucharmap, totem-pl-parser, libepc, > libgtop2, gtkhtml: you never know when there can be a new soname > bump in these. > * gnome-python-desktop and gnome-python-extras: the > python-gnome2-desktop and python-gnome2-extras binary packages > will soon be removed, expect a score of uninstallable > packages[2]. This way, we will be ready to shuffle source > packages if necessary when upstream decides what happens to all > deprecated modules. You can add a transition which is larger than all of these together: libpanel-applet is planned to be ported to D-Bus instead of bonobo. I have no details currently since it hasn’t been implemented yet, but it is likely to require source changes in all applets, meaning 50-60 source packages in Debian. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=