Re: libjpeg62-dev -> libjpeg-dev transition
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Pierre Habouzit (madcoder@madism.org) [090919 01:08]:
> > > > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will
> > > > migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to
> > > > block them until all the binNMUs are done, I don't think it is). Then
> > > > please ask for binNMUs of all the package that B-D on libjpeg-dev. Then
> > > > we will let that migrate.
> > > The question is: Are libjpeg62 and libjepg7 co-useable? (This only
> > > works if symbol versioning is turned on.)
> > Huh, libjpeg62 and libjpet7 have different so-name so they are
> > co-installable. I don't get what you mean with "co-useable" and it
> > certainly has nothing to do with symbol versioning.
> If you meant things built against libjpeg7 and loading plugins linked
> against the libjpeg62 then yes, I think we're good, because libjpeg7
> uses symbol versioning. libjpeg62 doesn't though.
Then they're not usable together under any circumstances where libjpeg7 will
be loaded into memory first.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Reply to: