On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Pierre Habouzit (madcoder@madism.org) [090919 01:08]: > > > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will > > > migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to > > > block them until all the binNMUs are done, I don't think it is). Then > > > please ask for binNMUs of all the package that B-D on libjpeg-dev. Then > > > we will let that migrate. > > > > The question is: Are libjpeg62 and libjepg7 co-useable? (This only > > works if symbol versioning is turned on.) > > Huh, libjpeg62 and libjpet7 have different so-name so they are > co-installable. I don't get what you mean with "co-useable" and it > certainly has nothing to do with symbol versioning. If you meant things built against libjpeg7 and loading plugins linked against the libjpeg62 then yes, I think we're good, because libjpeg7 uses symbol versioning. libjpeg62 doesn't though. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature