On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:49:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 02:19:28PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Jan Hauke Rahm wrote, Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:32:14 +0200 > >>>http://downloads.jhr-online.de/xcftools/xcftools_1.0.4-1+etch1.dsc > >>>http://downloads.jhr-online.de/xcftools/xcftools_1.0.4-1+lenny1.dsc > >> > >>Please go ahead for stable. > >> > >>As far as I can see, the oldstable packages don't actually contain > >>the fix... > > > >Yes, I'm sorry, the clean chroot was too clean :) > > > >Rebuild and uploaded to the same place: > >http://downloads.jhr-online.de/xcftools/xcftools_1.0.4-1+etch1.dsc > > > >Please re-check. KiBi offered sponsoring. > > Yep, that looks better. :-) Please go ahead with the oldstable > package as well. You probably remember there was a problem with the same version in stable and oldstable and uploading to both p-u queues. Now that stable had a point release, does it make sense to upload the fix again for oldstable -- IOW, will there be another oldstable point release? Hauke
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature