Hallo Roger, am Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:34:50PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:19:11PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Tim Retout wrote: > > > There is a bug in sbuild on various buildds (at least hppa, ia64, mips, > > > mipsel, s390, sparc) with versioned dependencies and virtual packages. > > > The details are in bug #395271, and it was fixed in sbuild 0.57.4-1. > > versioned dependencies on virtual packages are not supported and are > > still a bug AFAICS. > Yes, and (correct me if I'm wrong), but I don't think there's any > prospect of it becoming supported. Since it's virtual, each package > providing it will have a different version number, so it makes no > sense to have one in the dependency. If you need a versioned > depdendency, you need to depend upon a real package, or set of > alternative packages perhaps with each having a version requirement. > > Does apt even support this? isn't the problem rather that an older version is provided by perl-modules which is overridden by a real package which has a newer version? Still broken IMHO, though. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:phil@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `- finger pkern/key@db.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature