Re: libcdio transition
Nicolas Boullis wrote:
> Cheers,
>
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 08:03:20AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> If you are sure that there are no API changes, then please upload to
>> unstable and tell us when you did so we can schedule binNMUs (as it does
>> not seem to interfere with existing transitions).
>
> I just played with diff over the header files and... unfortunately,
> there are some API changes. A few functions were removed (I guess nobody
> used them anyway), added (that should be no problem) or even changed
> (only one function, that had its return changed from int to an enum,
> which should be safe).
>
> Is it alright anyway? Or would you prefer to check if everything's
> alright with bin-NMUs to experimental?
Just manually checking the builds of all reverse build dependencies with
the new version on one arch would also be fine.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: