[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#524745: give back drivel on mips and mipsel ?



Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> [2009-05-08 11:13]:
> 
>> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:51:05AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>> + Rafael Laboissiere (Fri, 08 May 2009 08:51:05 +0200):
>>>>> That's caused by a kernel bug on the mipsen buildds. It's not fixed, but
>>>>> a workaround has been introduced in glibc 2.9-9 or so that enables popen()
>>>>> et al. to work again. :-)
>>>> Is there any chance that this problem is also causing Bug#524745?
>>> No, I don't think so, since IIRC it also happened in (at least) powerpc
>>> and armel. Hopefully somebody can confirm that (Phil CC'ed for that).
>> At that time I happened almost everywhere, so it's certainly not a kernel
>> bug on mipsen only.  (I raised that to the bug report.)
>>
>> I didn't see it again since then, though.  Don't know if nothing octave-ish
>> has been retried or if there was a  fix somewhere.
> 
> To the best of my knowledge, no buildd of the octave-* packages has been
> attempted on mipsel since a while.  I did send a give-back request to
> debian-wb-team@l.d.o, but nothing seems to happen.

Nothing conclusive happened since then, but octave3.0 was getting built
and one octave3.0 build depending package was tried.

> I am really frustrated with this bug and I have the impression we
> are going nowhere.  I cannot believe that there is something wrong with
> the packages, since some of them had successful buildds against
> octave3.0, version 1:3.0.5-2:

The bug (and the buildd) was stuck for quite some days on your input on
how to debug it...

We still don't know what caused it nor what fixed it, but it seems to be
fixed now, so I'm closing this bug and will give back all packages.

> Curiously enough, the builds above were done on April 14, 2009.  The
> failed builds due to the hanging octave3.0 postinst script seem to have
> happened after that date.  Did anything change on the mipsel autobuilders
> around that date? 

Probably the buildds got an upgraded toolchain.

Cheers

Luk


Reply to: