Re: GTK+ update proposal for stable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> we’ve been having a new version of GTK+ targeted to lenny ready for a
> while, but refrained from uploading it because of the impact on the
> installer.
Without testing the binaries myself I think this is the best time to do
the update since we'll need to do a debian-installer update for 5.0.1
due the gpg key updating.
However we'd need to check if it doesn't include regressions at directfb
support even though being a bugfix release the risk is low.
> If the release team agrees in principle, I need of course broad testing
> of this package on lenny systems before even thinking of including it in
> a point release. Packages are available there:
> http://malsain.org/~joss/debian/gtk+/
- From d-i POV we just need to do tests with those binaries to avoid
regressions; we could coodinate that together so we could give it a try
and if we find any regression deal with it before doing ahead with the
uploads.
However I'd wait for SRM team agreement about it before start any test
for it.
Cheers,
- --
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
- ---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
- ---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAkmYWq0ACgkQLqiZQEml+FX0iwCfYeo82PAL7ScUHv3tB2OQbHA2
wecAoL45+1cTvXKBOGS7jHR4zBhOiuOU
=2Io0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: