Re: Iceape removal
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> wrote:
>>>> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>>>> Luk Claes wrote:
>>>>>> Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes?
>>>>> I'll do that in the next days.
>>>> Ok, thanks!
>>> I've filed a bug against release-notes. Do the now obsolete binary
>>> packages (like iceape-browser) need to be removed by FTP masters?
>> It's already removed by FTP masters, iceape just needs to migrate to
>> have any effect in testing (which won't happen before all reverse deps
>> are fixed).
>
> What do you mean by that? Theorically, there is nothing to do to reverse
> dependencies. Keeping iceape-dev and iceape-dev-bin ensures they can be
> built from source, but they shouldn't need rebuilding or any NMU.
Ah, ok, the better. That just means that the issues listed in
`grep-excuses iceape` need to be solved before it migrates.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: