Re: Iceape removal
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:03:36PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On 2009-01-28, Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> wrote:
> >> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >>> Luk Claes wrote:
> >>>> Do you also take care of documenting this in the Release Notes?
> >>> I'll do that in the next days.
> >> Ok, thanks!
> >
> > I've filed a bug against release-notes. Do the now obsolete binary
> > packages (like iceape-browser) need to be removed by FTP masters?
>
> It's already removed by FTP masters, iceape just needs to migrate to
> have any effect in testing (which won't happen before all reverse deps
> are fixed).
What do you mean by that? Theorically, there is nothing to do to reverse
dependencies. Keeping iceape-dev and iceape-dev-bin ensures they can be
built from source, but they shouldn't need rebuilding or any NMU.
Mike
Reply to: