No I haven't talked to them. Indeed, the quick fix I provided is not the right solution for upstream, but it looks like a good workaround for lenny since we're closer and closer to the release (now that D-I rc2 was announced). > the problem ? Or even your patch ? (but I think they will prefer modify= > hgk itself to call hg with the quiet option instead of adding yet a wra= pper). The proper fix is to actually modify the hgk code to actually enclose each call to hg from hgk into a tcl/tk catch clause and test for the result of $::errorCode and proceed if that is "NONE". I can provide my modified hgk in this direction, still I am unsure this would be really useful since this was my first attempt to change a tcl/tk program and it would definitely be inappropriate for lenny since there are many changes in that code to make it ignore warnings. If fixing hgk proves to be too difficult, upstream could add a "nowarn" configuration to hg and always call hg with that option on. > I would prefer to have some input from upstream before modifying our ve= rsion of > mercurial. But unless upstream strongly oppose to your patch, I will ad= d it > (or a variant) in the Debian package. OK, I can talk with upstream about this issue. > Many thank for your patch You're welcome. --=20 Regards, EddyP =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature