On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 07:36:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 02:17:14PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > >> On Monday 26 January 2009 11:24, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > >>> I tried to discuss this with my sponsor (in CC) but he didn't answer for > >>> a few days and to not delay release I want to ask you directly: > >> I've been away for the weekend. > > > > I hope you don't mind. I didn't want to be rude or anything... > > > >> I think the chance that someone wants to change the behaviour of > >> squirrelmail-configure is sufficiently small that I think it's perfectly > >> acceptable if this change would be done in the next release. However, if you > >> and the release team are fine with fixing it for Lenny, of course that is ok. > > > > Well, I just don't want to be the one who is the first to blame after > > release because of some obvious misconfigurations... :) > > > > So, release-team? > > I don't think it should be fixed for Lenny. Okay, thanks for your time and sorry for bothering! Hauke
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature