Re: Request for freeze exception for maxima
* Riku Voipio [Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:36:24 +0300]:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:11:04AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > It's ok to migrate gcl, since it's a targetted fix for armel. maxima
> > from unstable, otoh, is not appropriate.
> > Do you know if gcl -45 will built maxima 5.13 correctly in armel? If so,
> > how about getting gcl -45 in, and building maxima in testing for armel?
> I don't *know*, but if maxima 5.13 compiles with ok with gcl -45 on
> other arches, I don't see why it wouldn't on armel too.
Ok then. I've unblocked gcl -45, and will see if if w-b massaging gets
maxima built against testing.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Pedro Guerra - Contra el poder
Reply to: