Re: Request for freeze exception for maxima
* Riku Voipio [Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:45:37 +0300]:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:20:08AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> > The details are
> > maxima_5.13.0-3.1, recompile with gcl 2.6.7-44, 1, alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
> > That is, all archs but armel (where Camm tells me it won't help) and
> > m68k, where gcl is Not-For-Us.
> For the the record, gcl for armel has been fixed by Camm (thanks!).
> Letting gcl and maxima migrate would fix two long-standing
> uninstallables of armel (wims and wxmaxima).
It's ok to migrate gcl, since it's a targetted fix for armel. maxima
from unstable, otoh, is not appropriate.
Do you know if gcl -45 will built maxima 5.13 correctly in armel? If so,
how about getting gcl -45 in, and building maxima in testing for armel?
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best night and
day to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle
any human being can fight and never stop fighting.
-- e.e. cummings
Reply to: