On Tuesday 20 May 2008 13:36, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 11:58, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > Reading that blog post, it becomes clear to me that there's no immediate > > problem with this address, only that it ideally "shouldn't have been done > > this way". I don't see a ground for doing this "asap". > > with "asap" wasn't meant DSA-like. I think your blog post with title "stolen" suggests malice and is not representative of the real severity of the issue. I suggest that you add a bit more nuance to it. We're getting multiple mails of people already that read your post without reading ICANN's and think there's something dangerous going on. thanks, Thijs
Attachment:
pgpPhClGWjoJr.pgp
Description: PGP signature