El 03/11/08 12:02 Felipe Sateler escribió:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es> wrote:
> > * Jonas Smedegaard [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:58:27 +0100]:
> >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:34:11PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >> >* Jonas Smedegaard [Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:46:22 +0100]:
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:34:50PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> >> >Since I posted the first mail, an RC bug was filed against csound
> >> >> >(503633) . I have reuploaded to mentors a fix, but I can't upload to
> >> >> >t-p-u since I'm not a DD. My co-maintainer (CCed) seems to be busy
> >> >> >right now.
> >> >> >Would any of the release team review and upload the changes?
> >> >>
> >> >> Sorry for being silent lately - you guessed right. I am swamped with
> >> >> work (but it seems to loosen up a bit from now on).
> >> >>
> >> >> I have a moment now, so I'll have a go at releasing for t-p-u!
> >> >
> >> >Upload seen, will be unblocked once it's built for all architectures.
> >>
> >> Excellent! :-)
> >
> > Package failed to buid on alpha and mipsel, is this something you would
> > know something about?
> >
> >
> > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=csound&suite=testin
> >g
>
> I don't have time yet to get into the problem (will do on thursday), but a
> quick look suggests that mipsel has something wrong with it's java
> (unfortunately, csound's build system will just disable java instead of
> bombing out with an explanation. Alpha I have no idea what went wrong,
> but is not Java-related (although it would have failed later on about that
> anyway).
OK, so I have a fix for the alpha issue (I'm surprised it hadn't failed
before, it was an alpha-specific fix with a typo). I still have no clues as
to why Java is not being picked up in mipsel and alpha: both seem to have an
existing jni.h and jni_md.h (which is what csound looks for). Perhaps the
problem is that csound only looks
in /usr/lib/{java,jvm/java,jvm/java-1.5.0,jvm/default-java}/include. The
first three are upstream's, the last one is a debian addition. Should I be
adding more paths?
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.