Re: Bug#503634: aptitude in testing-proposed-updates depends on libept0 in sid

[Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>]

Hello, binNMU in t-p-u/i386 scheduled, Christian you need not do
anything else, I'm closing the bug.

Thanks all,

* Noritada Kobayashi [Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:00:20 +0900]:

> Hi,

> 2008/10/27 Deng Xiyue <manphiz-guest@users.alioth.debian.org>:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:27:45AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >> Quoting Christian Perrier (bubulle@debian.org):
> >> > Quoting Kobayashi Noritada (nori1@dolphin.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp):
> >> > > Package: aptitude
> >> > > Version: 0.4.11.10-1lenny1.1
> >> > > Severity: normal


> >> > > Hi,

> >> > > aptitude 0.4.11.10-1lenny1.1 uploaded to testing-proposed-updates
> >> > > depends on libept0 (>=0.5.26), but testing (lenny) currently ships
> >> > > libept0 0.5.22, making aptitude uninstallable:


> >> > OK, my mistake. I built it in a sid chroot...:-(

> >> > So, RM, you should not allow aptitude from t-p-u to enter
> >> > testing. Failed attempt of mine....:-(


> >> And, sorry for this, but I won't have time in the next days to do
> >> another attempt....



> > IMHO scheduling a binNMU should be enough to handle this.

> I think so after checking the source package.
> Is it possible to do binNMU for testing-proposed-updates against testing?

> I have checked http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU.
> Is a following line enough for the request?

> aptitude_0.4.11.10-1lenny1.1, Rebuild against testing fixes #503634, 1, i386

> Thanks,

> -nori



-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
             Listening to: The Wallflowers - God don't make lonely girls