On 21-Oct-2008, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, October 21, 2008 14:48, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > > I disagree that the severity should be lowered, because according > > to the documentation on bugs.d.o this severity is perfectly fine > > for such kind of issues. However I agree that this issue shouldn't > > hinder us from releasing (if it would be the only rc bug ;), so in > > my pov the release-team should tag this a lenny-ignore issue. > > > > What does release team say about this? > > How about just fixing that changelog entry instead of having this > discussion? Or am I missing something here that makes the fix not an > extremely trivial one? It does seem a trivial fix to me, but only for a specific class of people (i.e. the package maintainers, who have the missing data to complete the entry). -- \ “Are you thinking what I'm thinking, Pinky?” “Uh... yeah, | `\ Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?” | _o__) —_Pinky and The Brain_ | Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature