Re: gem and libquicktime
- To: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>
- Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, tolimar@debian.org, 421560@bugs.debian.org, 484190@bugs.debian.org, 485798@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: gem and libquicktime
- From: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:00:37 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080922220037.GA31667@chistera.yi.org>
- Mail-followup-to: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, tolimar@debian.org, 421560@bugs.debian.org, 484190@bugs.debian.org, 485798@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 48D58A02.8090504@p10link.net>
- References: <[🔎] 48D58A02.8090504@p10link.net>
* peter green [Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:40:50 +0100]:
> A NMU of gem was made by "Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar@debian.org
> <mailto:tolimar%40debian.org>>" to fix the rc bugs 421560, 484190 and
> 485798 and was unblocked by "he". Unfortunately it has picked up a
> depedency on a new upstream version of libquicktime which is blocking
> it's transition to testing.
> IMO the most reasonable soloution would be for someone (I can't do it
> because I'm not a dd) to reupload the NMU to testing proposed-updates.
> Does the release team agree.
Yes, I asked Alexander to do that.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: James Blunt - Sugar Coated
Reply to: