[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: pwlib-titan needs to be binNMU'd on sparc



* Jurij Smakov [Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:17:03 +0100]:

> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:50:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:14:10PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:

> > > It appears that pwlib-titan version currently in unstable got 
> > > miscompiled on sparc somehow, that's currently causing RC build 
> > > failures of gnugk (#478502, note that this fails on a number of 
> > > architectures, so other people should test whether rebuilding 
> > > pwlib-titan on failing arches fixes it) and openh323-titan (#475601). 
> > > I have rebuilt pwlib-titan with the current sid toolchain, installed 
> > > the resulting packages in the sid chroot and was able to successfully 
> > > build both gnugk and openh323-titan. Please binNMU pwlib-titan on 
> > > sparc (or let me know if I should do it myself), that should fix two 
> > > outstanding RC bugs.

> > BinNMU scheduled; gnugk and openh323-titan given back with dep-waits set.

> Both have built successfully on sparc [0,1] against the binNMU'd 
> version of libpt-1.11.2 (from pwlib-titan source). It is probably 
> reasonable to do the same (binNMU pwlib-titan and give back gnugk and
> openh323-titan with dep-waits on the new libpt-1.11.2 version) on 
> s390, m68k and armel (even though openh323-titan is reported as built 
> successfully on m68k, gnugk still fails, so I guess a rebuild will not 
> hurt).

> [0] http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=&p=gnugk&a=sparc
> [1] http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=&p=openh323-titan&a=sparc

I know this is a very old thread, but since I see no reply to this mail:
does something still need doing?

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
                      Listening to: La Buena Vida - No lo esperaba de mí


Reply to: