Re: Request for freeze exception for maxima
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:27:32 +0100]:
Hey there again,
> * Riku Voipio [Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:36:24 +0300]:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:11:04AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > It's ok to migrate gcl, since it's a targetted fix for armel. maxima
> > > from unstable, otoh, is not appropriate.
> > > Do you know if gcl -45 will built maxima 5.13 correctly in armel? If so,
> > > how about getting gcl -45 in, and building maxima in testing for armel?
> > I don't *know*, but if maxima 5.13 compiles with ok with gcl -45 on
> > other arches, I don't see why it wouldn't on armel too.
> Ok then. I've unblocked gcl -45, and will see if if w-b massaging gets
> maxima built against testing.
It seems wanna-build cannot be told to build maxima in unstable. So, if
you'd like to use some armel machine to upload maxima packages built
against testing, that'd be great.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
«¡Pero si es tan español que debe de tener el cerebro en forma de botijo,
con pitorro y todo!»
-- Javier Cercas, “La velocidad de la luz”
Reply to: