[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Request for freeze exception for maxima



* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:27:32 +0100]:

Hey there again,

> * Riku Voipio [Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:36:24 +0300]:

> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:11:04AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > It's ok to migrate gcl, since it's a targetted fix for armel. maxima
> > > from unstable, otoh, is not appropriate.

> > > Do you know if gcl -45 will built maxima 5.13 correctly in armel? If so,
> > > how about getting gcl -45 in, and building maxima in testing for armel?

> > I don't *know*, but if maxima 5.13 compiles with ok with gcl -45 on
> > other arches, I don't see why it wouldn't on armel too.

> Ok then. I've unblocked gcl -45, and will see if if w-b massaging gets
> maxima built against testing.

It seems wanna-build cannot be told to build maxima in unstable. So, if
you'd like to use some armel machine to upload maxima packages built
against testing, that'd be great.

Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
 
«¡Pero si es tan español que debe de tener el cerebro en forma de botijo,
con pitorro y todo!»
                -- Javier Cercas, “La velocidad de la luz”


Reply to: