Re: Request for freeze exception for maxima
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:11:04AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> It's ok to migrate gcl, since it's a targetted fix for armel. maxima
> from unstable, otoh, is not appropriate.
> Do you know if gcl -45 will built maxima 5.13 correctly in armel? If so,
> how about getting gcl -45 in, and building maxima in testing for armel?
I don't *know*, but if maxima 5.13 compiles with ok with gcl -45 on
other arches, I don't see why it wouldn't on armel too.
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
Reply to: