Re: Preapproving wormux 0.8-2 upload (is this ok for migration?)
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Hello debian-release,
>
> I and Cyril Brulebois, as part of the DGT, made some changes to the
> wormux package which mainly consist of the following:
>
> Changes:
> wormux (1:0.8-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> .
> [ Cyril Brulebois ]
> * debian/control.in:
> - Fix grammar in the short description of the wormux-data package.
> * debian/control:
> - Refresh accordingly.
> * debian/watch:
> - Use upstream version mangling to replace “beta” with “~beta”, which
> should help sorting new upstream beta versions correctly.
> .
> [ Eddy Petrișor ]
> * moved to git for maintenance and changed Vcs-* fields accordingly
> * imported the refresh-patches mechanism from tokyocabinet's package;
> thanks MadCoder
> * added simplepatchsys for patch management
> * Updated copyright information:
> - Added more of the upstream authors
> - cleared up debian/* license, thanks to all co-maintainers
> * imported some patches from upstream that fix important or RC bugs:
> - fix for a crash in the chat code when clearing the text
> - fix a segfault when the sound device wasn't available
> - do not load the index server needlessly with unaccessible games
> * update standards version to 3.8.0:
> - wrapped the Uploaders field
> - added debian/README.source, as recommended in debian-policy 4.14
>
> The debdiff between the official 0.8-1 and the pending 0.8-2 is attached
> (ignore 'UNRELEASED', it will be fixed).
>
>
> Is such a change ok for upload and, if proven stable, migration to
> lenny? If not, which part is unacceptable?
Yes, please upload.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: