[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: unblock request for consolekit_0.2.10-2



Release Team,

am Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:45:12AM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> please unblock consolekit_0.2.10-2.

consolekit/0.2.10-1 got an automatic freeze exemption.  Although the
ultimate authority is with the RMs to approve and reject packages we
considered new upstream versions as exempt before.

This is the debdiff from 0.2.10-1 to 0.2.10-2:

diff -u consolekit-0.2.10/debian/changelog consolekit-0.2.10/debian/changelog
--- consolekit-0.2.10/debian/changelog
+++ consolekit-0.2.10/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+consolekit (0.2.10-2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * debian/patches/03-cleanup_console_tags.patch
+    - Properly initialize GError to avoid daemon crash if /var/run/console/
+      does not exist. Also, demote message about it from warning to debug,
+      since it is not an error condition at all. (Closes: #492686)
+      Patch by Martin Pitt, thanks.
+
+ -- Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>  Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:09:28 +0200
+
 consolekit (0.2.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release. (Closes: #464005, #489030)
diff -u consolekit-0.2.10/debian/patches/03-cleanup_console_tags.patch consolekit-0.2.10/debian/patches/03-cleanup_console_tags.patch
--- consolekit-0.2.10/debian/patches/03-cleanup_console_tags.patch
+++ consolekit-0.2.10/debian/patches/03-cleanup_console_tags.patch
@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@
 +delete_console_tags (void)
 +{
 +      GDir *dir;
-+      GError *error;
++      GError *error = NULL;
 +      const gchar *name;
 +
 +      g_debug ("Cleaning up %s", CONSOLE_TAGS_DIR);
 +
 +      dir = g_dir_open (CONSOLE_TAGS_DIR, 0, &error);
 +      if (dir == NULL) {
-+              g_warning ("Couldn't open directory %s: %s", CONSOLE_TAGS_DIR,
++              g_debug ("Couldn't open directory %s: %s", CONSOLE_TAGS_DIR,
 +                         error->message);
 +              g_error_free (error);
 +              return;

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: