Adeodato Simó wrote: > However, I'm not sure who mentioned this possibility, but shipping > /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0 within wink sounds very ugly to me. It was me that suggested it ... > If upstream > won't update their binary, and you want to drop the symlink, on possible > solution is that wink ships a symlink in /usr/lib/wink/libexpat.so.0, > and uses LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/wink from the /usr/bin/wink wrapper > script. ... but I agree that this proposal is much better, especially since /usr/bin/wink is already a wrapper script anyway. best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <kmccarty@gmail.com> WWW: http://www.starplot.org/ WWW: http://people.debian.org/~kmccarty/ GPG: public key ID 4F83C751
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature