[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?



Hi Thijs,

On Tuesday 20 May 2008 13:40, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I think your blog post with title "stolen" suggests malice and is not
> representative of the real severity of the issue. I suggest that you add a

malice or not, if the old L would have answered with false (in which way ever) 
answers, there would be a significant part of users affected. Users (of 
users) of a stock bind9 right out of stable are also affected.
Yes, it was my intention have a strikingly subject to get the 
attention/awareness of the issue.

> bit more nuance to it. We're getting multiple mails of people already that
> read your post without reading ICANN's and think there's something
> dangerous going on.

WTF?!? I can't get, that people don't read the refered document, if they are 
so worried. It was not my intention to provide misleading informations, 
sorry.

With kind regards, Jan.
-- 
Never write mail to <waja@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: pgpiwey4Q2Gdt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: