[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?



Hi Thijs,

On Tuesday 20 May 2008 11:58, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Reading that blog post, it becomes clear to me that there's no immediate
> problem with this address, only that it ideally "shouldn't have been done
> this way". I don't see a ground for doing this "asap".

with "asap" wasn't meant DSA-like.

> Of course such an update could be put into the next point update if the
> maintainer provides it and the SRM's think it's ok. Alternatively we could
> roll it into another DSA for bind if an issue with bind would come up
> sometime in the future.

Lets see what LaMont says. :)

With kind regards, Jan.
-- 
Never write mail to <waja@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d-- s+: a- C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE
Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI- D++ G++ e++ h-- r+++ y+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: pgpve3qVhHpHu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: