Hi Luk, Thanks for taking a look. On 08/03/18 23:17 +0100, Luk Claes said ... > Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > On 08/01/05 17:00 +0100, Pierre Habouzit said ... > >> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:50:56PM +0000, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > >> Rrriiight, it'd be nice if reportbug could have the proper questions, > >> I never remember what the subject for RMs should be, and usually > >> maintainers don't ask for removals _that_ often, so it'd be best if > >> reportbug assumed we were stupid about that :) > > > Attached patch attempts to reduce this pain. Comments are welcome. TV > > indicated that he would sponsor an NMU if (among other bugs) it has this > > bug fixed. > > The current list mentions 'testing' while that is not supposed to be > reported against ftp.debian.org, but requested on the -release list OK. I will then modify the code such that a bug is not reported on ftp.debian.org for 'testing', but only a template mail is generated indicating the user to send it to debain-release. > instead. Additionally it would be good if there would for bugs regarding > testing-proposed-updates, stable-proposed-updates, > oldstable-proposed-updates, stable and oldstable be mentioned to also > contact the -release list. I'll deal with it like we handle WNPP ITPs (CC:ing debian-devel). Additionally, are there any other suites that I need to include in the list? Cheers, Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://www.appaji.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature