Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:02:42 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080302190242.GB23756@yellowpig>
Mail-followup-to: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <47BDDE44.9080202@debian.org>
References: <20080202013535.GA4780@bluemoon> <200802031459.13420.atomo64@gmail.com> <878x21ivo4.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <200802031914.29408.atomo64@gmail.com> <87r6ftcxir.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <200802032022.57514.atomo64@gmail.com> <20080204045526.GA9383@scowler.net> <47BDDE44.9080202@debian.org>

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:25:40PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> so.. what is the status of this? bill, do you intend to hand over
> su-to-root to debianutils?

At tis point, I do not intend to do that, no.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here.

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: Debian 4.1 and Python 2.5
Next by Date: gtimer rebuild for stable
Previous by thread: Re: Should su-to-root be shipped in a separate package?
Next by thread: fportfolio needs fassets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread