Re: em8300 REMOVED from testing
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 21/01/2008, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
>> I feel slightly puzzled by this package removal. OK, there is a bug
>> filed against the package, with severity serious.
> Then don't be puzzled any longer.
>> But the bug is tagged "unreproducible", and the submitter did not
>> reply to my last questions. Is there anything I should have done to
>> prevent the removal? Closing the bug for lack of information does not
>> look right to me. Would tagging the bug "moreinfo" have helpped? Or
>> should I have downgraded its severity for lack of information?
> Downgrading would IMHO have made sense. IANADD, IANARM, IANARMA, though.
Downgrading would certainly make sense in these kind of circumstances...