Re: Some possible binNMU requests
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 09:19:51PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> While just going through some piuparts failure logs in sid, I came
> across some breakages which could be sorted out with binNMUs. This is
> my first attempt at pointing out binNMUs, and I hope it there aren't
> many mistakes here; if there are, please forgive me and I'll learn
> from the mistake. The binNMUs are for all architectures, I guess.
> Here's the first batch:
> Due to libc-client2006j2 -> libc-client2007 in uw-imap:
> asterisk (several other dependencies also missing?)
This doesn't need a binNMU, it was sourcefully uploaded and only mips and
sparc remain unbuilt at this time.
If you're going to be proposing binNMUs, it would be helpful if you would
look at the buildd states for the packages, or the BTS, first:
> Due to liberis-1.3.11 -> liberis:
http://buildd.debian.org/sear, FTBFS for months.
> Due to libglib1.2 -> libglib1.2ldbl:
http://buildd.debian.org/xmovie, FTBFS for months.
> libgwenhywfar38 -> libgwenhywfar47 in libgwenhywfar:
> Due to libosip2:
> siproxd (I am _more_ unsure about this than the others)
http://buildd.debian.org/siproxd, another build failure on multiple archs.
> Due to libpetsc2.3.2 -> libpetsc2.3.3:
http://buildd.debian.org/illuminator, FTBFS for months.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/