Hi,
Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> As Neon 0.27.2 was accepted to the archives, I would like to urge
> everyone to use this version instead of the now unsupported 0.25.x and
> 0.26.y versions.
> The biggest targets are OpenOffice.org, which has a RFH (#419523 [1])
{...}
> Please ask your upstream if Neon 0.27 support is available or when it
> will be available and report back. My plan is to try the newest upstream
> versions of affected packages with version 0.27.2; if it does not
> compile, try to fix it and provide a patch. Real life says it will
> happen next weekend only. :-(
OOo 2.3.0 is supposed to build/work with neon 0.27.x with a patch I already
have in my tree. I'll make it use 0.27.x.
2.2.1 is not, but I won't do any work on it anymore anway.
But the problem is that I *do* want 2.2.1-9 to get into testing first
before uploading 2.3.0 to sid (security fix). Besides that, 2.3.0 is not
yet ready for upload to sid anyway (-report-builder using some binary
only jars of which I neeed to get all packages through NEW...)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature