Re: T&S for Release Assistents
On 30/08/07 at 12:40 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Amaya <amaya@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >> Hmm you mean I should inform a Maintainer's package for a package
> >> whose last 4 uploads since 2006-10-27 are NMUs ? for a bug that is
> >> what, 10 months old ? Heh. It qualifies to the 0-day NMU policy for so
> >> many reasons that well...
> >
> > I totally agree with you here!
> > Could we at least write those down or at least agree on what qualifies
> > to the 0-day NMU policy? As far as I know, it's just the "we are about
> > to release" reason I am familiar with.
>
> Acked too. If it's open for too long time and there's no activity,
> it's OK to NMU it.
>
> The only exception is if the maintainer is active and easy to contact
> so is nice to coodinate with him/her.
Before the release, we had a 0-day NMU policy for bugs older than 7
days. Maybe we could have a permanent 0-day NMU policy for bugs older
than 21 days, or older than a month?
Also, it would be great if this could be extended to the release goals.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: